Agenda, decisions and minutes

9. Land at former RAF Bicester, Bicester, Oxfordshire OX26 5HA.

Councillor Les Sibley, Non Statutory Interest, as a member of Bicester Town Council which had been consulted on the application.

Councillor Lynn Pratt, Non Statutory Interest, as a member of Bicester Town Council which had been consulted on the application.

Councillor Richard Mould, Non Statutory Interest, as a member of Bicester Town Council which had been consulted on the application.

Councillor Sandy Dallimore, Non Statutory Interest, as a member of Bicester Town Council which had been consulted on the application.

10. Former Rodney House, Private Drive off Graven Hill Road, Ambrosden.

Councillor Ian Corkin, Non Statutory Interest, as a Non-Executive Director of Graven Village Holding Company and would leave the meeting for the duration of the item.

Councillor Les Sibley, Non Statutory Interest, as a member of Bicester Town Council which had been consulted on the application and a separate declaration advising that he would leave the room for the discussion on deferral/site visit as he had lobbied the Committee regarding these subjects.

Councillor Lynn Pratt, Non Statutory Interest, as a member of Bicester Town Council which had been consulted on the application.

Councillor Richard Mould, Non Statutory Interest, as a member of Bicester Town Council which had been consulted on the application.

Councillor Sandy Dallimore, Non Statutory Interest, as a member of Bicester Town Council which had been consulted on the application.

11. Pakefield House, St Johns Street, Bicester, OX26 6SL.

Councillor David Hughes, Declaration, as the applicant was known to him.

Councillor Les Sibley, Non Statutory Interest, as a member of Bicester Town Council which had been consulted on the application.

Councillor Lynn Pratt, Non Statutory Interest, as a member of Bicester Town Council which had been consulted on the application.

Councillor Richard Mould, Non Statutory Interest, as a member of Bicester Town Council which had been consulted on the application.

Councillor Sandy Dallimore, Non Statutory Interest, as a member of Bicester Town Council which had been consulted on the application.

12. 7 Churchill Road, Kidlington, OX5 1BN.

Councillor Maurice Billington, Declaration, as he was an acquaintance of a neighbour to the application site and would speak as ward member and then leave the meeting so would not participate in the debate or vote on the item.

14. 32 Orchard Way, Bicester, OX26 2EJ.

Councillor David Hughes, Non Statutory Interest, as a neighbour of the application site was known to him.

Councillor Les Sibley, Non Statutory Interest, as a member of Bicester Town Council which had been consulted on the application.

Councillor Lynn Pratt, Non Statutory Interest, as a member of Bicester Town Council which had been consulted on the application.

Councillor Richard Mould, Non Statutory Interest, as a member of Bicester Town Council which had been consulted on the application.

Councillor Sandy Dallimore, Non Statutory Interest, as a member of Bicester Town Council which had been consulted on the application.

15. Woodgreen Leisure Centre, Woodgreen Avenue, Banbury, OX16 0HS.

Councillor Andrew Beere, Non Statutory Interest, as a  ...  view the full minutes text for item 111.

The Chairman to report on any requests to address the meeting.

Please note that the deadline for requests to address the meeting is noon on the working day before the meeting.

Currently Council meetings are taking place in person (not virtually) with social distancing measures at the meeting. Members of the public who wish to address the meeting can do so ‘virtually’ and are strongly encouraged to do so to minimise the risk of COVID-19 infection. Any person requesting to address the meeting will be advised of the arrangements for speaking, which are in addition to the usual public speaking rules for Planning Committee.   

The Chairman advised that requests to address the meeting would be dealt with at each item.

To confirm as a correct record the Minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 2 December 2021.

The Minutes of the meeting held on 2 December 2021 were agreed as a correct record and signed by the Chairman.

To receive communications from the Chairman.

There were no Chairman’s announcements.

There were no items of urgent business.

The Committee to consider requests for and proposed pre-committee site visits.

Any requests or recommendations for site visits will be published with the written update.

Resolved

(1)      That a site visit take place prior to the meeting at which application 21/00549/F, The Foscote Clinic, 2 Foscote Rise, Banbury. OX16 9XP will be considered by the  Planning Committee.

Application 21/00549/F, The Foscote Clinic, 2 Foscote Rise, Banbury. OX16 9XP.

It was proposed by Councillor Reynolds and seconded by Councillor C Clarke that a site visit take place at The Foscote Clinic, 2 Foscote Rise, Banbury, OX16 9XP as the ground level between the hospital site and residential properties in Foscote Rise was not evident from the plans and could only be appreciated when viewed from the hospital site and the rear of the residential properties.

Resolved

(1)      That a site visit take place prior to the meeting at which application 21/00549/F, The Foscote Clinic, 2 Foscote Rise, Banbury. OX16 9XP will be considered by the  Planning Committee.

Approved, conditions to be set out in the minutes

The Committee considered application 15/01357/F for the erection of 89 dwellings, creation of new access arrangement from Camp Road, creation of open space, hard and soft landscaping, associated ancillary works and infrastructure at Land East of Larsen Road, Heyford Park for Pye Homes Limited.

Nigel Pugsley, agent for the applicant, addressed the Committee in support of the application.

In reaching its decision the Committee considered the officer’s report and presentation, the written updates and the address of the public speaker.

Resolved

(1)      That authority be delegated to the Assistant Director for Planning and Development to grant permission for application 15/01357/F subject to:

i)        The completion of a planning obligation under section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, as substituted by the Planning and Compensation Act 1991, to secure the following (and any amendments as deemed necessary):

Affordable Housing:

• 27 units to be delivered

• Affordable mix to be agreed with CDC

• 50% of the affordable rented units must meet the Building Regulations Requirement M4(2) Category 2: Accessible and Adaptable Dwellings requirement. Additionally, 100% of the affordable housing units are to be built

the government's Nationally Described Space Standard (Technical Housing Standards). The wheelchair unit should conform to M4 (2) Category 3 of building regs accessibility requirement.

• The selection of the RP who will take on the affordable units should be agreed with the Council.

• The Council are currently reviewing its Affordable Housing Policies following the Governments initiative on First Homes and the Ministerial Statement 0n 24th May 2021.

Household Waste Recycling Centres

• Expansion and efficiency of Household Waste Recycling Centres (HWRC)- a contribution of £8,362

Apprenticeships & Skills

• The submission of an Employment Skills and Training Plan which would state the target number of apprenticeships within it and will require that it also sets out the arrangements through which the apprenticeships will be provided.

• Provision of 4 apprenticeships

Conservation of heritage interests - financial contribution in the region of £300,000

Biodiversity enhancement towards and/or provision of off-site ecological mitigation measures to an agreed specification and quantum;-Financial contribution in the region of £225,000

Support Improvement of local primary care infrastructure (OCCG) based on OCCGs adopted policy to use a calculation of 2.4 x number of dwellings x £360 for contributions to health infrastructure.-£76,896.

Contributions towards community infrastructure and open space:

• Indoor Sports Provision-£73,414.96

• Outdoor Sport Provision-£179,515.67

• Community Hall Facilities-£118,260

• Public Art/Public Realm-£19,936

• Community Development Worker-£6,243.38.

• Allotments-£64,856 capital sum to build out allotments and £4,888.00

           maintenance sum

• Cemetery Provision - tbc

• POS-maintenance for 15 years at £20.49 m2

• Tree/hedgerow maintenance for 15 years-£198.82 per tree/£20.49m2  hedge (to be measured)

• Combined LAP/LEAP with 3 pieces of equipment provided. Commuted  maintenance/inspection sum for 15 years-contribution of £138,352.65

• Commuted sum for maintenance of watercourse and swales (for 15 years)-   Total length of watercourse to be measured and multiplied by £116.98/m2/Swales £97.71 per m2

• Attenuation Pond-To be measured - £50.98 m2

Library-Funding of Bicester  ...  view the full minutes text for item 117.

Approved, conditions to be set out in the minutes

The Committee considered application 21/01224/OUT an outline planning application for Automotive Experience Quarter comprising Commercial, Business and Services uses (Class E), Light Industrial (Class B2), Local Community and Learning Uses (Class F) and vehicle circuits (Sui Generis) with all matters reserved aside from that of access) at Land at former RAF Bicester, Bicester, Oxfordshire. OX26 5HA for Bicester Motion.

It was proposed by Councillor Broad and seconded by Councillor Sibley that consideration of application 21/01224/OUT be deferred to allow for a full environmental impact assessment of the whole site to take place.

On being put to the vote the proposal was lost and the motion subsequently fell.

The Committee was advised that Councillor Wood had registered to speak on this application as ward member but since the agenda was published and as reported in the written update, the District Wards covered by the application were amended to Launton and Otmoor only.  As Councillor Wood was ward member for Fringford and Heyfords, he was no longer entitled to speak on the application as ward member.

Martin Arroyo representing Stratton Audley Parish Council addressed the Committee in objection to the application.

Dan Geoghegan, agent for the applicant, addressed the Committee in support of the application.

It was proposed by Councillor Broad that application 21/01224/OUT be refused as English Heritage had made a very serious objection and that the reserved matters condition should be removed.  There was no seconder to this proposal and the motion fell.

It was proposed by Councillor Reynolds and seconded by Councillor C Clarke that application 21/01224/OUT be approved in line with the officer recommendation but subject to an additional condition for the final wording of conditions 24 and 25 to be agreed in consultation with the Chairman of Planning Committee prior to any planning consent being issued.

In reaching its decision the Committee considered the officer’s report and presentation, the written updates and the addresses of the public speakers.

Resolved

(1)      That authority be delegated to the Assistant Director for Planning and Development to grant permission for application 21/01224/OUT subject to:

          i)        The completion of archaeological trial trenching and recording.

ii)       Public transport matters (including ensuring required connectivity    of services)

iii)       The completion of a planning obligation under section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, as substituted by the Planning and Compensation Act 1991, to secure the following (and any amendments as deemed necessary):

          • Highway works 1 (Upgrade to the B4100 Banbury Road / A4095 Southwold Lane / A4095 Lords Lane roundabout junction) – TBC

• Highway works 2 – (Improved connections between the site, Bicester’s train stations and the town centre) - £386,098

• Strategic Transport Contribution – (Dualling of eastern perimeter route, Skimmingdish Lane section) - £283,201

• Public Transport services – (Bus failure payment) – TBC (following further negotiations)

• Traffic Regulation Order (if not dealt with under S278/S38 agreement) - £6,380

• Travel Plan Monitoring Fee - £2,379

• CDC S106 monitoring fee - £1,000

·  OCC S106 monitoring fee –  ...  view the full minutes text for item 118.

Approved, conditions to be set out in the minutes.

The Committee considered application 21/01454/F for a proposed Bicester Health and Wellbeing Hub at Former Rodney House, Private Drive off Graven Hill Road, Ambrosden for Mr Richard Drew.

The Senior Manager - Development Management explained that Councillor Sibley had corresponded with all members of Planning Committee in advance of the Committee requesting that they support his proposal that consideration of application 21/01454/F be deferred to allow for a site visit. The Solicitor  had interpreted this as lobbying and Councillor Sibley had made a declaration accordingly and would leave the room while the Chairman asked if any member of the Committee wanted to propose a deferral or site visit.   Should the Committee continue to consider application 21/01454/F Councillor Sibley would be able to participate in the debate and vote on the application as he had not expressed a view on the application itself.

It was proposed by Councillor Broad and seconded by Councillor Dallimore that consideration of application 21/01454/F be deferred to allow for a site visit.

On being put to the vote the proposal was lost and the motion subsequently fell.  As the application would be considered by the Committee, Councillor Sibley re-joined the meeting.

Paul Troop of Bicester Bike Users’ Group addressed the Committee in objection to the application.

Dan Sames, local resident, addressed the Committee in support of the application.

In reaching its decision the Committee considered the officer’s report and presentation, the written updates and the addresses of the public speakers.

Resolved

(1)      That authority be delegated to the Assistant Director for Planning and Development to grant permission for application 21/01454/F subject to-:

i)   Re-consultation on an amended redline boundary plan and there being no further comments received which raise new issues not before the committee in their decision making by the expiry of the public consultation period;

ii)   The completion of a planning obligation under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, as substituted by the Planning and Compensation Act 1991, to secure the following (and any amendments as deemed necessary):

S106 Heads of Terms

a) £320,000 - Payment of a contribution to improve public transport (bus) provision to the site -

b) £TBC - Footway upgrade

c) £2,300 – OCC Travel Plan Monitoring Fee

d) £1,000 – CDC S106 monitoring fee

iii) The following conditions (and any amendments to those conditions as deemed necessary):

CONDITIONS

Time Limit

1.       The development to which this permission relates shall be begun not later than the expiration of three years beginning with the date of this permission.

Reason: To comply with the provisions of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, as amended by Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004

Compliance with Plans

2.       Except where otherwise stipulated by conditions attached to this permission, the development shall be carried out strictly in accordance with the following plans and documents:

IBI-AR-XX-XX-PL-100-004 Rev 17 – Proposed Site Masterplan

WIE11386-HHA-05-001 Rev A01 – Health Hub & Western Spine Road Vis.

16470-WIE-100-74-XX-ZZ-110 Rev  ...  view the full minutes text for item 119.

Refused, reasons to be set out in the minutes.

The Committee considered application 21/01818/F for the redevelopment of the site to form 38no retirement apartments including communal facilities, access, car parking and landscaping at Pakefield House, St Johns Street, Bicester, OX26 6SL for Churchill Retirement Living.

Alison Frecknall, local resident, addressed the Committee in objection to the application.

Paul Beaumont, local resident, addressed the Committee in objection to the application.

Laura Baker, agent for the applicant, addressed the Committee in support of the application.

In reaching its decision the Committee considered the officer’s report and presentation, the addresses of the public speakers and the written updates.

Resolved

(1)      That it be confirmed that, had the power to determine application 21/01818/F continued to rest with the Committee, the Committee would have refused application 21/01818/F for the following reasons:

1.       The proposed access into and out of the site and onto the private service road fails to provide adequate and necessary vision splays to the south of the access. The proposed development therefore fails to provide a safe access to and from the site contrary to Policy ESD 15 of the Cherwell Local Plan 2011-2031 as well as paragraph 110 of the National Planning Policy Framework.

2.       The PPG classifies development types according to their vulnerability to flood risk and provides guidance on which developments are appropriate within each Flood Zone. Car parks are classed as Less Vulnerable in accordance with table 2 of the Flood Zones and flood risk tables of the PPG. Tables 1 and 3 make it clear that this type of development is not compatible with this Flood Zone and therefore should not be permitted. In addition, the submitted Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) identifies a flood level for a 1% annual probability flood event with the appropriate allowance for climate change of 71.06m AOD. When compared to the topography of the site, the proposed development will result in a loss of flood storage at this level. The FRA proposes no mitigation for this and as such the development as proposed will increase the risk of flooding elsewhere. The proposed development is therefore contrary to paragraph 167 in the National Planning Policy Framework and its associated planning practice guidance and Policy ESD 6 of the Cherwell Local Plan 2011-2031.

3.       The submitted Flood Risk Assessment does not comply with the requirements for site-specific flood risk assessments, as set out in paragraphs 30 to 32 of the Flood Risk and Coastal Change section of the planning practice guidance. The Flood Risk Assessment does not therefore adequately assess the development’s flood risks. In particular, the FRA fails to take the impacts of climate change into account. The development provides inadequate mitigation to address flood risk for the lifetime of the development. The floodplain has not been safeguarded or compensation for lost flood storage provided. The proposed development is therefore contrary to paragraph 167 in the National Planning Policy Framework and its associated planning practice guidance and Policy ESD 6 of the Cherwell Local Plan 2011-2031.

4.       The ecological report submitted  ...  view the full minutes text for item 120.

Refused, reasons to be set out in the minutes.

The Committee considered application 21/03444/F for the demolition of an existing dilapidated and fire damaged single level dwelling - Class C3(a) - and erection of 4 No. flats in single, two level building - Class C3(a) at 7 Churchill Road, Kidlington, OX5 1BN for Mr Jack Piccaver.  This was a resubmission of application 21/01212/F.

Councillor Billington, local ward member, addressed the Committee in objection to the application.

Councillor Middleton, local ward member, addressed the Committee in objection to the application.

Jack Piccaver, the applicant, addressed the Committee in support of the application.

In reaching its decision the Committee considered the officer’s report and presentation, the addresses of the public speakers and the written updates.

Resolved

(1)      That application 21/03444/F be refused for the following reason:

1.       By virtue of its size and massing, the proposed development would have an overbearing impact on number 9 Churchill Road that would be detrimental to the living conditions of the neighbouring occupier through loss of light and outlook. The proposal is therefore contrary to Saved Policy C30 of the Cherwell Local Plan 1996, Policy ESD15 of the Cherwell Local Plan 2011-2031 Part 1 and Government guidance contained with the National Planning Policy Framework.

Withdrawn by the applicant.

The Chairman advised the Committee that application 21/03468/F, had been withdrawn by the applicant.

Approved, conditions to be set out in the minutes

The Committee considered application 21/03565/F for the conversion / extension of a garage to form a1-bed single storey dwelling at 32 Orchard Way, Bicester, OX26 2EJ for Mr Adrian White.  This was a resubmission of application 21/00790/F.

Mr Stephen Jeacock, neighbour to the application address, addressed the Committee in objection to the application.

Mr Adrian White, the applicant, addressed the Committee in support of the application.

It was proposed by Councillor Sibley and seconded by Councillor Broad that application 21/03565/F be refused as it would have an adverse impact on the street scene as the loss of vegetation to the front of the building would have a detrimental impact to the character of the area.  The width of the access to the entrance of the building and the height of the boundary with the neighbour were also brought into question.

The Planning Officer clarified the plans and the Senior Manager Development Management Manager suggested that if a greater level of control were required to overcome the concerns of the Committee additional conditions regarding Boundary Treatment and distance between the access door and boundary could be added.

The proposal for refusal was subsequently withdrawn.

It was proposed by Councillor Sibley and seconded by Councillor Broad that application 21/03565/F be approved subject to additional conditions to address the boundary with the neighbouring property, 34 Orchard Way, being at least 1.8 metre in height and the access to be no less than 1 metre from the shared boundary.

In reaching its decision the Committee considered the officer’s report and presentation, the written updates and the addresses of the public speakers.

Resolved

(1)      That permission be granted for application 21/03565/F subject to the following conditions and the addition of two further conditions relating to (with the exact wording delegated to officers):

·       Boundary treatment on the south west boundary shared with 34 Orchard Way: and

·       A compliance condition to ensure that the west facing elevation of the dwelling at the location of the front door was no less than 1 metre from the shared boundary line.

CONDITIONS

Time Limit

1.       The development to which this permission relates shall be begun not later than the expiration of three years beginning with the date of this permission.

Reason - To comply with the provisions of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, as amended by Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.

Compliance with Plans

2.       Except where otherwise stipulated by conditions attached to this permission, the development shall be carried out strictly in accordance with the following plans and documents: Site Location Plan, Block Plan and Drawing Numbers 01998/21/10 (Proposed Elevations) and 01998/21/11 (Proposed Plan).

Reason – For the avoidance of doubt, to ensure that the development is carried out only as approved by the Local Planning Authority and comply with Government guidance contained within the National Planning Policy Framework.

3.       The materials to be used for the external walls and roof of the development hereby permitted shall match in  ...  view the full minutes text for item 123.

Approved, conditions to be set out in the minutes

The Committee considered application 21/02857/F for the installation of a solar thermal water heating system to the roof of the building at Woodgreen Leisure Centre, Woodgreen Avenue, Banbury, OX16 0HS for Cherwell District Council.

In reaching its decision the Committee considered the officer’s report and presentation the written updates.

Resolved

(1)      That authority be delegated to the Assistant Director for Planning and Development to grant permission for application 21/02857/F subject to:

i)        The expiry of the public consultation period, and there being no further comments received which raise new issues not before the committee in their decision making: and

ii)        The following conditions (and any amendments to those conditions deemed necessary):

CONDITIONS

Time Limit

1.       The development to which this permission relates shall be begun not later than the expiration of three years beginning with the date of this permission.

Reason - To comply with the provisions of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, as amended by Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.

Compliance with Plans

2.       Except where otherwise stipulated by conditions attached to this permission, the development shall be carried out strictly in accordance with the following plans and documents: NTBS3540 T15/WLC/108

Reason – For the avoidance of doubt, to ensure that the development is carried out only as approved by the Local Planning Authority and comply with Government guidance contained within the National Planning Policy Framework

Approved, conditions to be set out in the minutes

The Committee considered application 21/04037/F for an electricity kiosk and 6no charging stations for Electric Vehicle Charging at Calthorpe Street West Short Stay Car Park, Calthorpe Street, Banbury, OX16 5EX for EZ Charge Limited.

In reaching its decision the Committee considered the officer’s report and presentation and the written and verbal updates.

Resolved

(1)      That authority be delegated to the Assistant Director for Planning and Development to grant permission for application 21/04037/F subject to:

i)        The expiry of the public consultation period and there being no further comments received which raise new issues not before the committee in their decision making: and

ii)        The following conditions (and any amendments to those conditions as deemed necessary):

CONDITIONS

Time Limit

1.       The development to which this permission relates shall be begun not later than the expiration of three years beginning with the date of this permission.

Reason - To comply with the provisions of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, as amended by Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.

Compliance with Plans

2.       Except where otherwise stipulated by conditions attached to this permission, the development shall be carried out strictly in accordance with the following plans and documents: drawing numbers OPAC-SSE-CM-XX-DR-E-0001 Rev 06, ACR-O-VOWH-LE-1400_01 D, ACR-O-VOWH-LE-1400_02 D, ACR-O-VOWH-LE-1400_03 D, ACR-O-VOWH-LE-1400_04 D and ACR-O-VOWH-LE-1400_05 D, and image showing the ‘EZC-_CPC1_SYSTEM_SPECFICATION'.

?

Reason – For the avoidance of doubt, to ensure that the development is carried out only as approved by the Local Planning Authority and comply with Government guidance contained within the National Planning Policy Framework.

Contaminated Land

3.       If, during development, contamination not previously identified is found to be present at the site, no further development shall be carried out until full details of a remediation strategy detailing how the unsuspected contamination shall be dealt with has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Thereafter the remediation strategy shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

Reason: To ensure that any ground and water contamination is identified and adequately addressed to ensure the safety of the development, the environment and to ensure the site is suitable for the proposed use, to comply with Saved Policy ENV12 of the Cherwell Local Plan 1996 and Section 15 of the National Planning Policy Framework.

4.       Notwithstanding the submitted details, no development shall commence in respect of the kiosk unless and until full design details of a mitigation scheme have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The scheme shall include alternative externally facing materials and landscaping details. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details prior to the first use of the development and shall be retained as such thereafter.

Approved, conditions to be set out in the minutes

The Committee considered application 21/04039/F for an electricity kiosk and 8no charging stations for Electric Vehicle Charging at Claremont Car Park, Land at Victoria Road, Bicester, OX26 6PH for EZ Charging Limited.

In reaching its decision the Committee considered the officer’s report and presentation and the written updates.

Resolved

(1)      That authority be delegated to the Assistant Director for Planning and Development to grant permission for application 21/04039/F subject to:

i)        The expiry of the public consultation period and there being no further comments received which raise new issues not before the committee in their decision making; and

ii)        The following conditions (and any amendments to those conditions as deemed necessary):

          CONDITIONS

Time Limit

1.       The development to which this permission relates shall be begun not later than the expiration of three years beginning with the date of this permission.

Reason - To comply with the provisions of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, as amended by Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.

Compliance with Plans

2.       Except where otherwise stipulated by conditions attached to this permission, the development shall be carried out strictly in accordance with the following plans and documents: drawing numbers OPAC-SSE-CM-XX-DR-E-0001 Rev 06, ACR-O-VOWH-LE-1400_01 D, ACR-O-VOWH-LE-1400_02 D, ACR-O-VOWH-LE-1400_03 D, ACR-O-VOWH-LE-1400_04 D and ACR-O-VOWH-LE-1400_05 D, and image showing the ‘EZC-_CPC1_SYSTEM_SPECFICATION'.

Reason – For the avoidance of doubt, to ensure that the development is carried out only as approved by the Local Planning Authority and comply with Government guidance contained within the National Planning Policy Framework

Approved, conditions to be set out in the minutes

The Committee considered application 21/04040/F for an electricity kiosk and 6no charging stations for Electric Vehicle Charging at Kidlington Centre Car Park, High Street, Kidlington, OX5 2DL for EZ Charge Limited.

In reaching its decision the Committee considered the officer’s report and presentation and the written updates.

Resolved

(1)      That authority be delegated to the Assistant Director for Planning and Development to grant permission for application 21/04040/F subject to:

i)        The expiry of the public consultation period and there being no further comments received which raise new issues not before the committee in their decision making; and

ii)        The following conditions (and any amendments to those conditions as deemed necessary):

          CONDITIONS

Time Limit

1.       The development to which this permission relates shall be begun not later than the expiration of three years beginning with the date of this permission.

Reason - To comply with the provisions of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, as amended by Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.

Compliance with Plans

2.       Except where otherwise stipulated by conditions attached to this permission, the development shall be carried out strictly in accordance with the following plans and documents: drawing numbers ACR-O-CTPC-LE-1300_01 C, ACR-O-VOWH-LE-1400_01 D, ACR-O-VOWH-LE-1400_02 D, ACR-O-VOWH-LE-1400_03 D, ACR-O-VOWH-LE-1400_04 D and ACR-O-VOWH-LE-1400_05 D, and image showing the ‘EZC-_CPC1_SYSTEM_SPECFICATION'.

Reason – For the avoidance of doubt, to ensure that the development is carried out only as approved by the Local Planning Authority and comply with Government guidance contained within the National Planning Policy Framework

Approved, conditions to be set out in the minutes

The Committee considered application 21/04089/F for the erection of an enclosure area including full height glazed windows and retractable fabric roof and two green wall features in CQ2 Block B Terrace area at The Light Cinema, Spiceball Park Road, Banbury, OX16 2PQ for The Light Cinemas.

In reaching its decision the Committee considered the officer’s report and presentation.

Resolved

(1)      The permission be grated for application 21/04089/F subject to the following conditions:

CONDITIONS

Time Limit

1.       The development to which this permission relates shall be begun not later than the expiration of three years beginning with the date of this permission.

Reason: To comply with the provisions of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, as amended by Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.

Compliance with Plans

2.       Except where otherwise stipulated by conditions attached to this permission, the development shall be carried out strictly in accordance with the following Plans and documents:

Terrace boundary plan 1049-LDA-B0-02-DR-A-08001

Existing Terrace Floor Plan 1049-LDA-B0-02-DR-A-08050

Proposed Terrace Floor Plan 1049-LDA-B0-02-DR-A-08002

Green Wall Feature 1049-LDA-B0-02-DR-A-08006

Terrace Roof Plan 1049-LDA-B0-XX-DR-A-08003

Existing Terrace Sections 1049-LDA-B0-02-DR-A-08052

Proposed Terrace Sections 1049-LDA-B0-XX-DR-A-08004

Existing Terrace Elevations 1049-LDA-B0-02-DR-A-08051

Proposed Terrace Elevations 1049-LDA-B0-XX-DR-A-08005

View 1 1049-LDA-B0-XX-DR-A-08010

View 2 1049-LDA-B0-XX-DR-A-08011

View 3 1049-LDA-B0-XX-DR-A-08012

View 4 1049-LDA-B0-XX-DR-A-08013

Reason: For the avoidance of doubt, to ensure that the development is carried out only as approved by the Local Planning Authority and comply with Government guidance contained within the National Planning Policy Framework

Report of Assistant Director Planning and Development

Purpose of report

To keep Members informed about planning appeal progress including decisions received and the scheduling of public inquiries and hearings for new and current appeals.

Recommendations

The meeting is recommended:

1.1         To note the position on planning appeals contained within the report.

The Assistant Director for Planning and Development submitted a report which informed Members about planning appeal progress including decisions received and the scheduling of public inquiries and hearings for new and current appeals.

Resolved

(1)            That the position statement be accepted.