Agenda, decisions and minutes


Executive - Monday 10 January 2011 6.30 pm

Venue: Bodicote House, Bodicote, Banbury, OX15 4AA. View directions

Contact: James Doble, Legal and Democratic Services  Email: james.doble@cherwell-dc.gov.uk (01295) 221587

Media

Items
Note No. Item

95.

Declarations of Interest

Members are asked to declare any interest and the nature of that interest that they may have in any of the items under consideration at this meeting.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Members declared interests in the following agenda items:

96.

Petitions and Requests to Address the Meeting

The Chairman to report on any requests to submit petitions or to address the meeting.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

There were no petitions or requests to address the meeting.

97.

Urgent Business

The Chairman to advise whether they have agreed to any item of urgent business being admitted to the agenda.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

There were no items of urgent business.

98.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 99 KB

To confirm as a correct record the Minutes of the meeting held on 6 December 2010.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The minutes of the meeting held on 6 December 2010 were agreed as a correct record and signed by the Chairman.

6.35 pm

99.

Housing in Cherwell and the Current Economic Climate pdf icon PDF 118 KB

Report of Head of Housing Services

 

Summary

 

·        To update the Executive on the progress made in implementing the Affordable Housing and the Recession Action Plan approved by Executive in January 2009

·        To advise the Executive on the Government’s proposed housing policy changes and housing and welfare benefit reform and its potential impact on the Council’s housing function in the current economic climate

·        To recommend to Executive a Housing & Current Economic Climate Action Plan to steer the Council through these changes until the new Housing Strategy is in place in April 2012.

·        To advise Executive on plans to bring forward a new Cherwell Housing Strategy in 2012 that will respond to the new policy context and financial climate

·        To endorse a Cherwell District Council response to the Government consultation “Local Decisions: a fairer future for social housing”

 

Recommendations

 

The Executive is recommended:

 

(1)               To note the progress and completion of the Affordable Housing and the Recession Action Plan (Appendix A)

 

(2)               To endorse a Housing and the Current Economic Climate Action Plan for moving forward (Appendix B)

 

(3)               To endorse the response to the Government consultation paper (Appendix C)

 

(4)               To note the current and proposed housing and welfare benefit changes and the potential impact upon the Housing Service (Appendix D)

 

(5)               To approve the plans to bring forward a Cherwell Housing Strategy and approve the structure for Member involvement in the Housing Strategy Programme Board

 

Additional documents:

Decision:

Recommendations Approved

 

Note – Members requested a seminar be arranged on the changes to social housing.

Minutes:

The Head of Housing Services submitted a report to:

 

·        Update the Executive on the progress made in implementing the Affordable Housing and the Recession Action Plan approved by Executive in January 2009

·        Advise the Executive on the Government’s proposed housing policy changes and housing and welfare benefit reform and its potential impact on the Council’s housing function in the current economic climate

·        Recommend to Executive a Housing & Current Economic Climate Action Plan to steer the Council through these changes until the new Housing Strategy is in place in April 2012.

·        Advise Executive on plans to bring forward a new Cherwell Housing Strategy in 2012 that will respond to the new policy context and financial climate

·        Endorse a Cherwell District Council response to the Government consultation “Local Decisions: a fairer future for social housing”

In the course of discussion it was noted that there were significant changes to both the terminology and delivery of social housing and Members requested a seminar be arranged to clarify these changes.

 

Resolved

 

(1)               That the progress and completion of the Affordable Housing and the Recession Action Plan be noted.

 

(2)               That the Housing and the Current Economic Climate Action Plan for moving forward as set out in the annex to the minutes (as set out in the minute book) be endorsed.

 

(3)               That the response to the Government consultation paper as set out in the annex to the minutes (as set out in the minute book) be endorsed.

 

(4)               Thatthe current and proposed housing and welfare benefit changes and the potential impact upon the Housing Service be noted.

 

(5)               That the plans to bring forward a Cherwell Housing Strategy and approve the structure for Member involvement in the Housing Strategy Programme Board be approved.

 

Reasons

 

The Coalition Government is proposing changes which will substantially affect the provision of housing services and housing related support. To support members in understanding the local impacts of these changes, this report outlined the work that was being proposed to ensure the Council is able to continue to respond to its Corporate Plan priorities, and deliver housing services within a value for money context.

 

Options

 

Option One

Accept the recommendations contained in this report, thereby endorsing the response to Government housing consultation, instructing officers to implement the Housing and Current Economic Climate Action Plan and approving medium term plans to bring forward a new Cherwell Housing Strategy

 

Option Two

Accept the recommendations contained in this report subject to any amendments by Members

 

Option Three

Not to approve plans to bring forward a Cherwell Housing Strategy. This would require new plans being produced for Members, and is not recommended.

 

6.55 pm

100.

Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document pdf icon PDF 78 KB

Report of Strategic Director Planning, Housing and Economy

 

Summary

 

To consider the Planning Obligations Draft Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) and to approve the use of the draft SPD as informal guidance with immediate effect.

 

Recommendations

 

The Executive is recommended:

 

(1)       To consider the Planning Obligations Draft Supplementary Planning Document (a copy is available in the Members Room and on request from the Planning Policy Team, it can also be viewed on the website) and endorse it for public consultation.

 

(2)               To approve the use of the draft Supplementary Planning Document as informal guidance with immediate effect.

 

(3)               To authorise the Strategic Director, Planning, Housing and Economy, in consultation with the Portfolio Holder Planning and Housing, to make any further minor non-substantive changes as are necessary to the draft Supplementary Planning Document prior to the publication for public consultation.

 

Additional documents:

Decision:

Recommendations Approved, subject to the following amendments:

 

Recommendation 1

 

 

(1)       To consider the Planning Obligations Draft Supplementary Planning Document (a copy is available in the Members Room and on request from the Planning Policy Team, it can also be viewed on the website) and endorse it for public consultation, the timing of which to be at the discretion of the Portfolio holder.

 

 

Recommendation 2 – Withdrawn

 

Note - Members made a number of observations which it was agreed would be considered prior to public consultation.

Minutes:

The Strategic Director Planning, Housing and Economy submitted a report to consider the Planning Obligations Draft Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) and sought approval for the use of the draft SPD as informal guidance with immediate effect.

 

During the course of the debate members made a number of detailed comments and observations, in light of which it was agreed would be considered prior to public consultation. Therefore recommendation 2 as set out in the report was withdrawn and recommendation 1 amended to enable the timing of the consultation to be at the discretion of the Portfolio Holder.

 

It was also requested that members of the Executive should be provide with full copies of any documents that they were being asked to consider for public consultation.

 

Resolved

 

(1)       That the Planning Obligations Draft Supplementary Planning Document be noted and subject to the consideration of observation raised at the meeting endorsed for public consultation, the timing of which to be at the discretion of the Portfolio holder.

 

(2)               That the Strategic Director, Planning, Housing and Economy, be authorised in consultation with the Portfolio Holder Planning and Housing, to make any further minor non-substantive changes as are necessary to the draft Supplementary Planning Document prior to the publication for public consultation.

 

Reasons

A Planning Obligations Draft Supplementary Planning Document has been prepared to offer more detailed guidance to supplement the polices in the Core Strategy on how the Council (as Local Planning Authority - LPA) will decide what new infrastructure and facilities need to be provided as a consequence of development and assess requirements for “in kind” provision and / or financial contributions towards provision.  Existing guidance on the Council’s requirements for planning obligations is given in the document ‘Interim Guidance on Planning Obligations’ approved in April 2007. 

 

Options

 

Option One

To endorse the SPD for public consultation and approve the use of the draft SPD as informal guidance for development control purposes with immediate effect.

 

Option Two

To endorse the SPD for public consultation with amendments and to approve the use of the draft SPD as informal guidance for Development Control purposes following amendment.

 

Option Three

Not to endorse the SPD for public consultation and not to approve the use of the draft SPD as informal guidance for Development Control purposes.

 

 

7.10 pm

101.

Recommendations from Overview and Scrutiny Committee- Car Parking Charges Call-in pdf icon PDF 72 KB

To consider recommendations from Overview and Scrutiny Committee on 5 January 2011 (if any) resulting from the Call-in of the Executive decisions regarding car parking charges.

Additional documents:

Decision:

**Not available for Call-in**

 

Resolution agreed as follows:

 

1. Reaffirm the decisions of the Executive on 6 December 2010 in connection with the implementation of car parking proposals, in order to get a balanced budget, and for these to be introduced on or as soon after 4 April 2011 as is practicable:

 

2. Reaffirm the decision of the Executive on 6 December 2010 to begin negotiations with Eames with regard to the covenant for Watt's Way car park, Kidlington

 

3. Request the Overview and Scrutiny Committee to take forward in its work programme in 2011/12 further investigation of the following strategic parking issues:

·          The balance and location of long stay/short stay parking in Banbury , Bicester and Kidlington

·          The wider economic impact of Parking Policy on the Districts urban centres

·          The cost benefit of alternative management arrangements for car parks, including 'Pay on Exit'.

 

4.  Report back to the Executive at the end of 2011 the outcome of its findings from 3        above and any recommendations for change.

 

**Not available for Call-in**

 

Minutes:

The Executive considered a referral back to them for reconsideration following consideration of a Call-in by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee, as set out below

 

We the named Councillors and non-executive members of Cherwell District Council hereby give notice that we wish to call in for further scrutiny the Executive decision’s of Monday 6th December 2010 regarding the proposals to increase Car Parking Fees, the extension of car parking hours, the introduction of parking fees for Blue Badge Holders and the decision to begin negotiations with regards to Watts Way, Kidlington. 

 

Councillor Sames, Chairman of the overview and Scrutiny Committee presented the referral as set out below:

 

That the proposals of the Executive to increase Car Parking Fees, the extension of car parking hours, the introduction of parking fees for Blue Badge Holders and the decision to begin negotiations with regards to Watts Way, Kidlington be referred back to the Executive and that in  reconsidering the decision the Executive should take note of the concerns expressed at the Overview and Scrutiny Committee meeting and the following 5 points:

 

1.      Ensure proper consultation on Watts Way, Kidlington

2.      Request the Executive investigate alternative ways to find funds (e.g. £39k to offset the introduction of evening charges)

3.      Investigate the feasibility of barrier parking/pay on exit

4.      Study the economic impact of parking charges

5.      Investigate the number of disabled bays across the district, the ratio of short to long stay spaces and motorcycle parking availability

 

As Labour Group Leader Councillor Sibley addressed the meeting.

 

In considering the referral, the Executive welcomed the detailed consideration the Committee had given to the issue and noted that there had been the opportunity for all interested parties at the meeting to contribute.

 

Resolved

 

(1)       That the decisions of the Executive on 6 December 2010 in connection with the implementation of car parking proposals be reaffirmed , in order to achieve a balanced budget, and for these to be introduced on or as soon after 4 April 2011 as is practicable:

 

(2)       That the decision of the Executive on 6 December 2010 to begin negotiations with Eames with regard to the covenant for Watt's Way car park, Kidlington be reaffirmed

 

(3)   That the Overview and Scrutiny Committee be requested to take forward in its work programme in 2011/12 further investigation of the following strategic parking issues:

 

·   The balance and location of long stay/short stay parking in Banbury, Bicester and Kidlington

·   The wider economic impact of Parking Policy on the Districts urban centres

·  The cost benefit of alternative management arrangements for car parks, including 'Pay on Exit'.

 

(4)       That the Overview and Scrutiny Committee be requested to report back to the Executive at the end of 2011 the outcome of its findings from 3        above and any recommendations for change.

 

Reasons

 

The Executive consider that on balance taking in to consideration all the evidence presented at the Overview and Scrutiny Committee, that their decisions on 6 December 2010 remain justified.

 

Options

 

Option One

To agree  ...  view the full minutes text for item 101.

7.25 pm

102.

Budget 2011/12 Draft 2 pdf icon PDF 74 KB

Report of Head of Finance

 

Summary

 

The Council has to adopt a budget for 2011/12 as the basis for calculating its level of Council Tax and has to base that budget on its plans for service delivery during the year, recognising any changes in service demand that may arise in future years.  This is the second opportunity that the Executive has to shape and refine the interaction between corporate plan service plans and financial matters before the final budget is presented to the Council on the 21 February 2011.

 

Recommendations

 

The Executive is recommended:

 

(1)               To note the outcome of the 2011/12 provisional settlement (detailed in Appendix 1);

(2)               To consider the draft revenue budget 2 (detailed in Appendix 2a) in the context of the Council’s service objectives and strategic priorities; (see thecorporate plan Appendix 2b);

(3)               To note the draft corporate plan for 2011/12 which is currently subject to consultation. (Detailed in Appendix 2b)

(4)               To agree the approach to the overall capital programme and 10/11 expenditure profile (detailed in Appendix 3);

(5)               To advise of any matters they would like taken into consideration in producing a balanced budget for the next meeting of the Executive ;

(6)               To consider the Tax Base Report (Appendix 4) and

·        to resolve that, in accordance with the Regulations, as amended, the amount calculated by the Cherwell District Council as its council tax base for the year 2011/2012 shall be 50,337; and

·        to approve the report of the Head of Finance, made pursuant to the Local Authorities (Calculation of Tax Base) Regulations 1992, as amended, and the calculations referred to therein for the purposes of the Regulations; and

·        to resolve that the tax base for parts of the area be in accordance with the figures shown in column 13 of Appendix 4b.

·        to resolve to continue with the discretionary awards that it resolved to give on December 1 2008.

 

Additional documents:

Decision:

Recommendations Approved

Minutes:

The Head of Finance submitted a report which provided the second opportunity for the Executive to shape and refine the interaction between corporate plan service plans and financial matters before the final budget is presented to the Council on the 21 February 2011.

 

Resolved

 

(1)                           That the outcome of the 2011/12 provisional settlement be noted;

(2)                           That the draft revenue budget 2be noted in the context of the Council’s service objectives and strategic priorities

(3)                           That the draft corporate plan for 2011/12 which is currently subject to consultation, be noted;

(4)                           That the approach to the overall capital programme and 10/11 expenditure profile set out in the annex to the minutes (as set out in the minute book) be agreed;

(5)                           That no further matters be taken into consideration in producing a balanced budget for the next meeting of the Executive at this time ;

(6)                           That the Tax Base Report set out in the annex to the minutes (as set out in the minute book) be noted and

·        that, in accordance with the Regulations, as amended, the amount calculated by the Cherwell District Council as its council tax base for the year 2011/2012 shall be 50,337; and

·        the report of the Head of Finance, made pursuant to the Local Authorities (Calculation of Tax Base) Regulations 1992, as amended, and the calculations referred to therein for the purposes of the Regulations be approved; and

·        that the tax base for parts of the area be in accordance with the figures shown in column 13 in the annex to the minutes (as set out in the minute book).

·        the council continue with the discretionary awards that it resolved to give on December 1 2008.

 

Reasons

 

The Council has to adopt a budget for 2011/12 as the basis for calculating its level of Council Tax and has to base that budget on its plans for service delivery during the year, recognising any changes in service demand that may arise in future years.

 

Options

 

Option One

To review draft revenue and capital budget to date and consider actions arising.

 

Option Two

To approve or reject the recommendations above or request that Officers provide additional information.

 

7.55 pm

103.

Culture and Heritage Value for Money Review pdf icon PDF 94 KB

Report of Interim Chief Executive

 

Summary

 

To consider the findings of the Value for Money (VFM) Review of Culture and Heritage report and the recommendations arising from the report

 

Recommendations

 

The Executive is recommended:

 

(1)               To endorse the overall conclusion of the review that the service is low cost for the Museum but high cost for its Arts service, has high performance in terms of visitor numbers to the museum and is high quality in terms of user satisfaction for the museum.

(2)               To agree that improvements in value for money be sought and approve the following recommendations for achieving savings of £81,130 in 2011/12;

a.      Introduce single staffing at BanburyMuseum, saving £13,385

b.      Reduce the Museum exhibitions budget and operational costs, saving £15,476

c.      Reduce arts funding by £31,906, ending grant aid support for all provision other than The Mill, Banbury

d.       Reduce Arts Officer hours to 43 per week, saving £15,108

e.      Reduce the operational revenue budget for Arts officers by 26%, saving £5,255

(3)               To cease core service funding of The Courtyard, Bicester due to the intended change in use of the facility from a dedicated youth arts centre which, prima facie, negates the operational agreement the Council is party to. However, retain the provision of a dedicated arts officer to the facility to continue support for the remaining youth arts provision. Subject to further negotiation with OCC and the Arts Council Lottery Unit, this will enable further savings of £38,000 in 2011/12.

(4)               To agree in principle subject to further assessment, to transfer the operation of the Museum and Tourist Information Centre (TIC) into a bespoke Trust developed for the purpose from 2013/14, saving an estimated £64,000 in NNDR.

(5)               To ask officers to bring a detailed report on the creation of a Trust for the Museum and TIC to a future meeting.

Additional documents:

Decision:

Recommendations Approved

Minutes:

The Interim Chief Executive submitted a report to consider the findings of the Value for Money (VFM) Review of Culture and Heritage report and the recommendations arising from the report

 

Resolved

 

(1)               That the overall conclusion of the review that the service is low cost for the Museum but high cost for its Arts service, has high performance in terms of visitor numbers to the museum and is high quality in terms of user satisfaction for the museum be endorsed.

(2)               That improvements in value for money be sought and that the following recommendations for achieving savings of £81,130 in 2011/12 be approved;

a.      Introduce single staffing at Banbury Museum, saving £13,385

b.      Reduce the Museum exhibitions budget and operational costs, saving £15,476

c.      Reduce arts funding by £31,906, ending grant aid support for all provision other than The Mill, Banbury

d.       Reduce Arts Officer hours to 43 per week, saving £15,108

e.      Reduce the operational revenue budget for Arts officers by 26%, saving £5,255

(3)               That core service funding of The Courtyard, Bicester be ceased due to the intended change in use of the facility from a dedicated youth arts centre which, prima facie, negates the operational agreement the Council is party to. However, retain the provision of a dedicated arts officer to the facility to continue support for the remaining youth arts provision. Subject to further negotiation with OCC and the Arts Council Lottery Unit, this will enable further savings of £38,000 in 2011/12.

(4)               That subject to further assessment, it be agreed in principle to transfer the operation of the Museum and Tourist Information Centre (TIC) into a bespoke Trust developed for the purpose from 2013/14, saving an estimated £64,000 in NNDR.

(5)               That officers be requested to bring a detailed report on the creation of a Trust for the Museum and TIC to a future meeting.

Reasons

 

This review forms part of the Value for Money programme of reviews, which aims to cover all services within the Council and improve the value of services offered to residents of Cherwell. Culture and Heritage was selected as an area for a ‘health check’ review during 2010/11 along with a number of other services as these had not previously been covered by the VFM programme but account for a high level of expenditure. The aim of such reviews is to quickly identify potential savings using information that is readily available.

Options

 

Option One

 

To make savings of £183,130 as set out in the recommendations, which will significantly reduce the costs of the service, including arts funding, while still retaining a reasonable level of service provision

Option Two

To make further savings of £66,000 in arts development funding to bring it in line with the average spend of comparator authorities. This would require the loss of two posts and the end of funding to The Mill, putting the sustainability of the service in question.