The Committee
considered application 25/03234/OUT, an outline planning
application (with All Matters Reserved except for access)
comprising a residential development of up to 74 dwellings (Use
Class C3) with associated access, landscaping, amenity space,
drainage and associated works at Land to the East of Claydon Road
Cropredy for Obsidian Strategic Asset Management Ltd.
Geoff Scammans, on
behalf of Keep Cropredy Rural and Jacqui Smith, Vice Chair of
Cropredy Parish Councill addressed the committee in objection to
the application.
Paul Galgey, agent on
behalf of the applicant, addressed the committee in support of the
application.
It was proposed by
Councillor Aramini-Brant and seconded by Councillor Webb that
application 25/03234/OUT be refused in line with the officer
recommendation for the reasons set out in their report.
In reaching its
decision the Committee considered the officer’s report and
presentation, the addresses of the public speaker and the
written updates.
Resolved
That, in line with
officer recommendation, application 25/02895/OUT be refused for the
following reasons (and any amendments to as deemed necessary), with
authority delegated to officers, in consultation with the Chair of
Planning Committee, to add or remove refusal reasons, in the event
of an appeal being lodged against the refusal, in light of new
evidence becoming available.
- The proposal would be
an urbanising form of development, would result in the permanent
loss of open greenfield land at the northern edge of Cropredy and
would extend built form into the Upper Cherwell Basin landscape. It
fails to adequately recognise the intrinsic character and beauty of
this part of the countryside, nor would it be sympathetic to the
landscape setting of the northern edge of Cropredy and the Oxford
Canal corridor. The proposal would adversely impact the rural
setting of the village and would result in a harmful visual
intrusion of development into the landscape and open countryside
and would therefore result in harm to the rural character and
appearance and quality of the area, and to views from sensitive
public receptors, particularly users of the Oxford Canal towpath.
The proposal is therefore contrary to Policies ESD13 and ESD15 of
the Cherwell Local Plan 2011-2031 Part 1, Saved Policies C8 and C28
of the Cherwell Local Plan 1996, Policies SP1, CSD25, COM2, COM10,
COM14, COM26 and COM27 of the draft Cherwell Local Plan 2042 and
the National Planning Policy Framework including paragraphs 135 and
187.
- The proposed
development would be sited in a geographically unsustainable
location with poor access to services and facilities and therefore
future residents would be highly reliant on the private car to meet
their day to day needs which would not reduce the need to travel
and would result in increased car journeys and hence carbon
emissions. The proposed development therefore conflicts with
Policies ESD1 and SLE4 of the Cherwell Local Plan 2011-2031 Part 1,
Policies CSD1, CSD22 and CSD23 of the draft Cherwell Local Plan
2042 and Government guidance in the National Planning Policy
Framework. This identified harm would significantly and
demonstrably outweigh the benefits associated with the proposed
development and therefore the development does not constitute
sustainable development when assessed against the National Planning
Policy Framework as a whole.
- In the absence of the
completion of a satisfactory Section 106 Agreement, the Local
Planning Authority is not convinced that the necessary
infrastructure directly required as a result of this development,
in the interests of supporting the sustainability of the village
and the development, and in the interests of safeguarding public
infrastructure and securing on site future maintenance
arrangements, will be provided. This would be contrary to Policies
INF1, PSD1, BSC3, BSC10, BSC11 and BSC12 of the Cherwell Local Plan
2011-2031 Part 1, Policies COM2, COM20, COM23 and COM24 of the
draft Cherwell Local Plan 2042, and Government guidance contained
within the National Planning Policy Framework.