Venue: Bodicote House, Bodicote, Banbury, OX15 4AA. View directions
Contact: Natasha Clark, Legal and Democratic Services Email: natasha.clark@cherwell-dc.gov.uk (01295) 221589
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Declarations of Interest Members are asked to declare any interest and the nature of that interest which they may have in any of the items under consideration at this meeting.
Minutes: There were no declarations of interest. |
|
|
Urgent Business The Chairman to advise whether they have agreed to any item of urgent business being admitted to the agenda.
Minutes: There was no urgent business. |
|
|
To confirm as a correct record the Minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 12 January 2010. Minutes: The Minutes of the meeting held on 12 January 2010 were agreed as a correct record and signed by the Chairman. |
|
|
Registered Social Landlords' Management Group This is an opportunity for the Board to learn more about the Registered Social Landlords’ Management Group, including its links to the Council’s corporate priorities, the national standards that apply and to explore strategic and operational issues relating to the management of housing stock across the district. A background briefing on the management of social housing in the Cherwell district is attached at appendix 1.
The Portfolio Holder Planning and Housing, Strategic Director Planning, Housing and Economy and Housing Officers will be present at the meeting. Representatives from Charter, Bromford and Residents’ Voice have also been invited to attend the meeting.
The Board will wish to reflect on the presentation and evidence and if there are any issues that they wish to explore further, these should be added to the 2010/11 Work Programme.
Minutes: The Chairman welcomed the Portfolio Holder Planning and Housing, the Head of Housing Services, the Strategic Housing Manager, the Strategic Housing Officer and the representatives from Charter Community Housing, the Bromford Group and Charter Residents’ Voice to the meeting.
The Chairman explained that this was an opportunity for the Board to learn more about the Registered Social Landlords’ Management Group, including its links to the Council’s corporate priorities, the national standards that apply and to explore strategic and operational issues relating to the management of housing stock across the district. Following the discussion the Board would reflect on the evidence presented and if there were any issues that they wished to explore further, these should be added to the 2010/11 Work Programme.
The Strategic Housing Officer began by setting the overall context for Cherwell’s Housing Services work with the Registered Social Landlords (RSL). As part of its strategic housing function, the Council still has a role to play in how the former “council houses” are managed, as well as other social housing in the district. Most of the day to day operation is undertaken by the Registered Social Landlords and in doing so they are accountable to and monitored by the Tenant Services Authority (a government appointed national organisation).
There are 16 Registered Social Landlords operating in the district with stock holdings ranging from just four properties to over 5000 homes. The Council works closely with these Registered Social Landlords to ensure the effective management of social housing in the district. The Council chairs and facilitates the quarterly Cherwell RSL Housing Management Group meetings, and undertakes an annual appraisal with each Registered Social Landlord. The Council recognises that this approach does not suit the smaller Registered Social Landlords and so it is looking at other ways to engage them, possibly through a “buddy” system or attendance on a rota basis.
The Strategic Housing Officer explained that the main duties of the Registered Social Landlords can be described as:
The Board heard that over the last twenty years the focus of attention had moved from the traditional activities of allocations and rent, repairs and maintenance. The emphasis was now on addressing worklessness amongst social housing residents and introducing measures to promote neighbourhood and community. The involvement of residents and tenants was a key aspect of this approach.
In response to questions from the Board the Strategic Housing Officer explained that although the management of social housing is undertaken by the Registered Social Landlords, the Council maintains a housing register and nominates (i.e. decides on) applicants to move into Registered Social Landlord homes. The Council normally secures full nomination rights on the majority of properties with the Registered Social Landlords typically retaining rights on about 10% for emergency cases. Properties are advertised through the Choice Based Lettings scheme and people can bid for up to 3 properties during each fortnightly advertising cycle and modify their bids according to the popularity of ... view the full minutes text for item 47. |
|
|
Partnership Scrutiny: Oxfordshire Rural Community Council Report of Head of Legal and Democratic Services
Summary
To consider the outcomes of the scrutiny review of the Council’s partnership with Oxfordshire Rural Community Council and to agree the recommendations to Executive.
The draft report will be circulated separately to Members.
Recommendations
The Resources and Performance Scrutiny Board is recommended to:
(1) Note the briefing on the review of representation on Outside Bodies. (2) Consider the draft report (circulated separately to Members of the Board) and agree the draft report be circulated to Officers for comments. (3) Agree that the Democratic, Scrutiny and Elections Manager in consultation with the Chairman of the Resources and Performance Scrutiny Board be delegated to agree any amendments to the report prior to submitting to the Executive. Additional documents:
Minutes: The Board reflected on the outcomes of its scrutiny review of the Council’s partnership with Oxfordshire Rural Community Council and discussed the draft recommendations to the Executive. The Portfolio Holder for Community Safety, Street Scene and Rural was present at the meeting and participated in the discussion.
The Board confirmed that the Oxfordshire Rural Community Council was a valuable and important partnership for Cherwell District Council without which it would be difficult to deliver the Council’s rural agenda.
The Board discussed the role of elected Members in the Council’s partnership with Oxfordshire Rural Community Council and agreed that the current arrangement should continue but that it should be strengthened and the respective role and responsibilities of the Portfolio Holder and the elected ward member should be clarified. The Board felt that it was important to distinguish between the role of the Portfolio Holder in shaping the strategic direction of the partnership and determining funding and service level agreements and that of the elected member providing knowledge and experience of rural issues within the district. The Board agreed that the elected member should represent a rural ward.
Throughout the course of the Review the Board had raised some general issues about the role and responsibilities of elected Members who represent the Council on partnerships and outside bodies. The Board noted that in spring 2009 the Executive had requested further information setting out how the Council would effectively support member representatives on partnerships and outside bodies. The Chairman reported that a project group had been established to review representation on outside bodies. The Board agreed that that the review addressed the issues that they had raised and commented that it was important for there to be a defined role for elected Members representing the Council on outside bodies and partnerships and that the responsibilities for this role should be defined and strengthened.
Resolved
1) That the briefing on the review of representation on Outside Bodies be noted. 2) That the following recommendations to the Executive be included in the report on the Oxfordshire Rural Communities Council: a) That an annual programme of aims/objectives (aligned to the Rural Strategy Action Plan and the Council’s corporate priorities) be agreed with Oxfordshire Rural Community Council and regularly reviewed and monitored by officers, the elected Member representative from a rural ward and reported to the Portfolio Holder. b) That the role and involvement of elected Members (the representative from a rural ward and the Portfolio Holder) in the Council’s partnership with Oxfordshire Rural Community Council be clarified and strengthened. c) That the elected Member representative from a rural ward should work closely with rural community development officers and safer communities and community development officers to provide overall steer and direction for the partnership. 3) That the draft report Oxfordshire Rural Communities Council be circulated to Officers for comment. 4) That the Democratic, Scrutiny and Elections Manager in consultation with the Chairman of the Resources and Performance Scrutiny Board be delegated to agree any amendments to the ... view the full minutes text for item 48. |
|
|
Report of Head of Legal and Democratic Services
Summary
To provide the Board with an update on the overview and scrutiny work programme for 2009/10.
Recommendations
The Resources & Performance Scrutiny Board is recommended to:
(1) Note the current Resources & Performance Scrutiny Board element of the work programme for 2009/10 as set out at Appendix 1. (2) Note the update on the Bicester Vision Partnership. Additional documents: Minutes: The Board considered a report of Head of Legal and Democratic Services on the overview and scrutiny work programme for 2009/10.
The Board agreed that a report on the Contracts Review and a monitoring report on Past Year Budget Scrutiny Recommendations should be considered at the June meeting.
Partnerships: Cherwell Safer Communities Partnership The Board was informed that the value for money review of the Cherwell Safer Communities Partnership had been delayed but that work was now starting on the scoping of the project. The Board confirmed that this was an important subject area and agreed that it should remain on their work programme for scrutiny in 2010/11.
Partnerships: Bicester Vision Partnership The Chairman reported that he and the Vice-Chairman had yet to meet the Leader of the Council to discuss the arrangements and timing for the further scrutiny of the Bicester Vision Partnership. The topic would remain on the work programme for 2010/11.
The Board noted that this would be their last meeting until the new municipal year and expressed concern about the absence of a formal meeting date in March. They agreed to review the schedule of meetings for 2010/11 at their June meeting with a view to adding an extra meeting if necessary.
Resolved
1) That the Resources & Performance Scrutiny Board element of the work programme for 2009/10 as detailed above be noted and carried forward to the work programme for 2010/11. 2) That the update on the Bicester Vision Partnership be noted. 3) That the dates for the Board meetings in 2010/11 be reviewed at the Board meeting in June 2010.
|