Agenda, decisions and minutes


Executive - Monday 6 June 2016 6.30 pm

Venue: Bodicote House, Bodicote, Banbury, OX15 4AA

Contact: Natasha Clark, Democratic and Elections  Email: natasha.clark@cherwellandsouthnorthants.gov.uk, 01295 221589

Media

Items
Note No. Item

1.

Declarations of Interest

Members are asked to declare any interest and the nature of that interest that they may have in any of the items under consideration at this meeting.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

There were declarations of interest.

2.

Petitions and Requests to Address the Meeting

The Chairman to report on any requests to submit petitions or to address the meeting.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

There were no petitions or requests to address the meeting.

3.

Urgent Business

The Chairman to advise whether they have agreed to any item of urgent business being admitted to the agenda.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

There were no items of urgent business.

4.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 221 KB

To confirm as a correct record the Minutes of the meeting held on 4 April 2016.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The minutes of the meeting held on 4 April 2016 were agreed as a correct record and signed by the Chairman.

5.

Chairman's Announcements

To receive communications from the Chairman.

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Chairman made the following announcement:

 

1.    Members of the public were permitted to film, broadcast and report on the meeting, subject to the efficient running of the meeting not being affected.

 

6.35pm

6.

Private Hire Licensing and Hackney Carriage Policy 2016 pdf icon PDF 139 KB

Report of Public Protection Manager

 

Purpose of report

 

To seek approval of the joint draft Cherwell and South Northamptonshire Council Private Hire and Hackney Carriage Licensing Policy prior to public and stakeholder consultation.

 

Recommendations

            

The meeting is recommended:

 

 1.1        To approve the joint draft Cherwell and South Northamptonshire Council Private Hire and Hackney Carriage Licensing Policy.

 

1.2         To delegate authority to the Public Protection Manager to consider responses and, if necessary amend the policy in consultation with the Lead Member for Public Protection.

 

Additional documents:

Decision:

Resolved

 

(1)          That the joint draft Cherwell and South Northamptonshire Council Private Hire and Hackney Carriage Licensing Policy (annex to the Minutes as set out in the Minute Book) be approved.

 

(2)           That authority be delegated to the Public Protection Manager to consider responses and, if necessary amend the policy in consultation with the Lead Member for Public Protection.

 

Minutes:

The Public Protection Manager submitted a report to seek approval of the joint draft Cherwell and South Northamptonshire Council Private Hire and Hackney Carriage Licensing Policy prior to public and stakeholder consultation.

 

Resolved

 

(1)          That the joint draft Cherwell and South Northamptonshire Council Private Hire and Hackney Carriage Licensing Policy (annex to the Minutes as set out in the Minute Book) be approved.

 

(2)           That authority be delegated to the Public Protection Manager to consider responses and, if necessary amend the policy in consultation with the Lead Member for Public Protection.

 

Reasons

 

By approving the joint draft Private Hire and Hackney Carriage Licensing Policy we will be able to consult and then implement a policy which will improve and strengthen our taxi licensing regime, ensuring public safety.

 

Alternative options

 

Option 1: Not to approve the joint draft Cherwell and South Northamptonshire Council Private Hire and Hackney Carriage Licensing Policy. This is not recommended as the proposed policy includes a number of updates and improvements with a clear policy statement.

 

 

6.45pm

7.

Disabled Facilities Grants and Better Care Funding pdf icon PDF 157 KB

Report of Head of Regeneration and Housing

 

Purpose of report

 

To provide an update on changes to Disabled Facilities Grant (DFG) funding and to seek the Executive’s direction on suggested opportunities to improve the Council’s service to disabled residents that arise from those funding changes.

 

Recommendations

            

The meeting is recommended:

 

 1.1        To leave the Council’s capital contribution for Disabled Adaptations unchanged.

 

1.2         To confirm that any of the total DFG capital budget in excess of what is required to deliver mandatory DFGs should be utilised to make identified improvements to the delivery of adaptations and assistance to eligible disabled residents.

 

1.3         To note that, in accordance with its Scheme of Delegation to Officers and its Private Sector Housing Grants and Assistance Policy, the Head of Regeneration & Housing and the Lead Member for Housing will determine what additional forms of grants and loans may be appropriate to improve DFG service and delivery.

 

Additional documents:

Decision:

Resolved

 

(1)          That the Council’s capital contribution for Disabled Adaptations be left unchanged.

 

(2)          That it be confirmed that any of the total Disabled Facilities Grants (DFGs) capital budget in excess of what is required to deliver mandatory DFGs should be utilised to make identified improvements to the delivery of adaptations and assistance to eligible disabled residents.

 

(3)          That it be noted that, in accordance with the Scheme of Delegation to Officers and its Private Sector Housing Grants and Assistance Policy, the Head of Regeneration & Housing and the Lead Member for Housing will determine what additional forms of grants and loans may be appropriate to improve DFG service and delivery.

 

Minutes:

The Head of Regeneration and Housing submitted a report to provide an update on changes to Disabled Facilities Grant (DFG) funding and to seek the Executive’s direction on suggested opportunities to improve the Council’s service to disabled residents that arise from those funding changes.

 

The Chairman requested that officers submit an update report to Executive in due course.

 

Resolved

 

(1)          That the Council’s capital contribution for Disabled Adaptations be left unchanged.

 

(2)          That it be confirmed that any of the total Disabled Facilities Grants (DFGs) capital budget in excess of what is required to deliver mandatory DFGs should be utilised to make identified improvements to the delivery of adaptations and assistance to eligible disabled residents.

 

(3)          That it be noted that, in accordance with the Scheme of Delegation to Officers and its Private Sector Housing Grants and Assistance Policy, the Head of Regeneration & Housing and the Lead Member for Housing will determine what additional forms of grants and loans may be appropriate to improve DFG service and delivery.

 

Reasons

 

The total DFG budget resulting from an increased HWB contribution will allow services to disabled households to be improved beyond the scope of what can be achieved through the established mandatory grants. Officers believe, in particular, that there are opportunities to simplify operations and speed up delivery. Although a suggested range of possible improvements will all require further investigation and working-up, they do not require additional funding by the Council, simply for the existing capital allocation to be maintained for 2016-17.

 

Alternative options

 

Option 1: To reduce the Council’s £375k capital allocation for 2016-17, by a sum to be determined, and thereby reduce the total DFG budget. This option would result in the Council foregoing some, or all, of the opportunities to develop and enhance the service provided to disabled residents.

 

6.55pm

8.

Safeguarding Policy and Internal Review Update pdf icon PDF 125 KB

Report of Director of Operational Delivery

 

Purpose of report

 

To consider an update of the Council’s joint safeguarding policy and receive an update on the progress made to date on implementing the recommendations from the internal safeguarding review.

 

Recommendations

            

The meeting is recommended:

 

 1.1        To approve the updated joint Safeguarding policy as attached at Appendix 1.

 

1.2         To note the work carried out to date to implement the agreed recommendations from the internal review.

 

Additional documents:

Decision:

Resolved

 

(1)          That the updated joint Safeguarding policy (annex to the Minutes as set out in the Minute Book) be approved.

 

(2)          That the work carried out to date to implement the agreed recommendations from the internal review be noted.

 

Minutes:

The Director of Operational Delivery submitted a report to consider an update of the Council’s joint safeguarding policy and receive an update on the progress made to date on implementing the recommendations from the internal safeguarding review.

 

Resolved

 

(1)          That the updated joint Safeguarding policy (annex to the Minutes as set out in the Minute Book) be approved.

 

(2)          That the work carried out to date to implement the agreed recommendations from the internal review be noted.

 

Reasons

 

The revised joint policy is comprehensive and makes reference to the latest legislation providing a robust and thorough Safeguarding Policy document. The procedures for reporting a concern are clear and reference the new See it Report it intelligence gathering system.

 

Alternative options

 

Option 1: Not to update the policy; this is not a viable alternative given the change in duties placed upon Local Authorities

 

7.05pm

9.

Bicester Healthy New Town Status pdf icon PDF 158 KB

Report of Operational Delivery

 

Purpose of report

 

To consider Bicester’s participation in the NHS England Healthy New Town Programme. The Leader of the Council has agreed to the submission of this report which has not featured on the Forward Plan as the NHS England Programme requirements have only recently been clarified.

 

Recommendations

            

The meeting is recommended:

 

 1.1        To support Bicester’s participation in the NHS England Healthy New Town Programme.

 

1.2         To agree for the Council to act as the lead and accountable body for the Bicester Healthy New Town Programme.

1.3         To support the inclusion of this activity in the consideration by the Bicester Strategic Delivery Board.

 

1.4         To agree to a Healthy New Town Cherwell fund of £20,000 to serve as an enabling fund to secure further external funding for the Bicester initiatives beyond 2016/17.

 

Additional documents:

Decision:

Resolved

 

(1)          That Bicester’s participation in the NHS England Healthy New Town Programme be supported.

 

(2)          That agreement be given for the Council to act as the lead and accountable body for the Bicester Healthy New Town Programme.

 

(3)          That the inclusion of this activity in the consideration by the Bicester Strategic Delivery Board be supported.

 

(4)          That agreement be given to a Healthy New Town Cherwell fund of £20,000 to serve as an enabling fund to secure further external funding for the Bicester initiatives beyond 2016/17.

 

 

Minutes:

The Director of Operational Delivery submitted a report to consider Bicester’s participation in the NHS England Healthy New Town Programme.

 

Resolved

 

(1)          That Bicester’s participation in the NHS England Healthy New Town Programme be supported.

 

(2)          That agreement be given for the Council to act as the lead and accountable body for the Bicester Healthy New Town Programme.

 

(3)          That the inclusion of this activity in the consideration by the Bicester Strategic Delivery Board be supported.

 

(4)          That agreement be given to a Healthy New Town Cherwell fund of £20,000 to serve as an enabling fund to secure further external funding for the Bicester initiatives beyond 2016/17.

 

Reasons

 

The scale and nature of Bicester’s development has provided an excellent opportunity to be enhanced through the NHS England Healthy New Town programme. NHS England has recognised in its shortlisting of Bicester to participate along with the offer of a range of support including financial.

 

A wider multi-disciplinary and multi-sector partnership group form Bicester and Oxfordshire has also responded very positively to this initiative and is now in the process of preparing a detailed set of proposals which turn intent into action. This requires a programme lead which is proposed to be undertaken by this Council and it is this which is reflected in the report recommendations.

 

Alternative options

 

Option 1: Not to engage in the NHS England HNT Programme and withdraw for these activities. This is not proposed due to the relevance and benefits of this programme to Bicester

 

 

 

7.15pm

10.

Performance Report 2015-2016 Quarter 4 / End of Year pdf icon PDF 188 KB

Report of Director of Strategy and Commissioning

 

Purpose of report

 

To provide information relating to quarter four of the annual performance year, for the period 1 January - 31 March 2016.  The report also reflects end of year outturns as measured through the performance management framework.

 

Recommendations

             

The meeting is recommended to:

 

1.1         Note that despite tough performance targets, a challenging economic environment, and on-going policy and organisational change, Cherwell District Council has met or made satisfactory progress on 96% of all the performance targets outlined in its performance management framework as detailed in paragraph 3.2.

 

1.2         Note that any feedback on performance issues from Overview & Scrutiny Committee at its meeting on 31 May 2016 will be provided directly to The Leader.

 

1.3         Approve the Annual report (appendix 4) for publication.

 

 

Additional documents:

Decision:

Resolved

 

(1)          That it be noted that despite tough performance targets, a challenging economic environment, and on-going policy and organisational change, Cherwell District Council has met or made satisfactory progress on 96% of all the performance targets outlined in its performance management framework.

 

(2)          That it be noted that there was no feedback on performance issues from the Overview & Scrutiny Committee at its meeting on 31 May 2016 provided directly to The Leader.

 

(3)           That the Annual report (annex to the Minutes as set out in the Minute Book) be approved for publication.

 

Minutes:

The Director of Strategy and Commissioning to provide information relating to quarter four of the annual performance year, for the period 1 January - 31 March 2016. The report also reflected end of year outturns as measured through the performance management framework.

 

Resolved

 

(1)          That it be noted that despite tough performance targets, a challenging economic environment, and on-going policy and organisational change, Cherwell District Council has met or made satisfactory progress on 96% of all the performance targets outlined in its performance management framework.

 

(2)          That it be noted that there was no feedback on performance issues from the Overview & Scrutiny Committee at its meeting on 31 May 2016 provided directly to The Leader.

 

(3)           That the Annual report (annex to the Minutes as set out in the Minute Book) be approved for publication.

 

Reasons

 

This is a report of the Council’s performance in the fourth quarter of 2015/16 measured through the performance management framework. The report covers key areas of performance against the Council’s 12 public pledges and the 2015/16 business plan. The report also contains performance information around the Corporate Equalities Plan and Significant Partnerships.

 

In this final quarter report we show that the Council has made strong progress towards delivering its ambitions to improve the services delivered to the public and against key projects and priorities, despite tough performance targets, a challenging economic environment, and on-going policy and organisational change. It also demonstrates the Council’s proactive performance management of issues raised and the inclusive role of Overview and Scrutiny in supporting performance review.

 

With a 96% delivery rate against the key strategic priorities and the deliverables that sit underneath them the report clearly demonstrates that the council’s performance is excellent, and that together we are making a significant and positive difference to the District, our residents, businesses and other key stakeholders. There can be no other recommendations to make, other than to commend everyone who has contributed to such excellent performance, of which we should all be proud.

 

Alternative options

 

Option 1: To request additional information on items and/or add to the work programme for review and/or refer to Overview and Scrutiny.

 

7.20pm

11.

2015/16 Draft Revenue Outturn pdf icon PDF 348 KB

Report of Chief Finance Officer / Section 151 Officer

 

Purpose of report

 

To provide an initial draft update on the Council’s revenue outturn for 2015/16    

 

Recommendations

            

The meeting is recommended:

 

 1.1        To note the contents of the report.

 

Additional documents:

Decision:

Resolved

 

(1)          That the report be noted.

Minutes:

The Chief Finance Officer / Section 151 Officer submitted a report to provide an initial draft update on the Council’s revenue outturn for 2015/16.

 

In response to comments from Councillor Woodcock, Leader of the Labour Group, regarding the reported shortfall in rental income from Castle Quay, the Chairman requested that the Town Centre Managers submit a report to the September or October Executive on the matter and the reasoning.

 

Resolved

 

(1)          That the report be noted.

 

Reasons

 

The Executive has the responsibility for managing the Council’s resources. A key element of this is budgetary control, and the final outturn for the year is the measure of the accuracy of budgeting and budgetary control throughout the year.

 

Alternative options

 

Option 1: To not note the report but members will not be aware of the likely outturn and performance against budget for 2015/16 if they choose to take this option.

7.25pm

12.

Proposal for a Joint Revenues and Benefits Service with South Northamptonshire Council pdf icon PDF 150 KB

Report of Chief Finance Officer / Section 151 Officer

 

Purpose of report

 

This report presents the final business case following consultation for a joint Revenues and Benefits service across Cherwell District and South Northamptonshire Councils (hereafter “Cherwell” or “CDC” and “South Northamptonshire” or “SNC” respectively).

 

The report recommends the formation of a two way joint Revenues and Benefits service and in doing so seeks the Executive’s agreement for the non-staffing elements of the business case.

 

The proposal is part of the wider transformation programme across the two Councils.

 

Recommendations

            

The meeting is recommended:

 

1.1       To consider the attached final business case and the consultation responses in relation to non-staffing matters as outlined in section 5.1.

 

1.2         To note that the business case will be considered by the Joint Commissioning Committee with regard to staffing matters on 26 May 2016. This will include consultation responses from affected staff and trade union representatives.

 

1.3         To approve and implement the proposed final business case to share a joint Revenues and Benefits Service between CDC and SNC, subject to similar consideration and approval by SNC Cabinet on 13 June 2016 and approval of the staffing implications by the Joint Commissioning Committee.

 

1.4         To delegate to the Chief Finance Officer in consultation with the Leader of the Council any non-significant amendment that may be required to the business case following the decision by SNC Cabinet and/or the Joint Commissioning Committee.

 

1.5         To approve the allocation of £200,000 from general fund balances to cover 50% of the implementation costs.

 

Additional documents:

Decision:

Resolved

 

(1)          That the final business case for a Joint Revenues and Benefits Service with South Northamptonshire Council (SNC) and the consultation responses in relation to non-staffing matters be considered.

 

(2)          That it be noted that the business case was approved by the Joint Commissioning Committee with regard to staffing matters on 26 May 2016 and that this included consideration of consultation responses from affected staff and trade union representatives.

 

(3)          That the proposed final business case to share a joint Revenues and Benefits Service between CDC and SNC, subject to similar consideration and approval by SNC Cabinet on 13 June 2016, be approved and implemented.

 

(4)          That authority be delegated to the Chief Finance Officer, in consultation with the Leader of the Council, to make any non-significant amendment that may be required to the business case following the decision by SNC Cabinet.

 

(5)          That the allocation of £200,000 from general fund balances to cover 50% of the implementation costs be approved.

Minutes:

The Chief Finance Officer / Section 151 Officer submitted a report which presented the final business case following consultation for a joint Revenues and Benefits service across Cherwell District and South Northamptonshire Councils and sought approval for the non-staffing elements of the business case.

 

The proposal was part of the wider transformation programme across the two Councils.

 

Resolved

 

(1)          That the final business case for a Joint Revenues and Benefits Service with South Northamptonshire Council (SNC) and the consultation responses in relation to non-staffing matters be considered.

 

(2)          That it be noted that the business case was approved by the Joint Commissioning Committee with regard to staffing matters on 26 May 2016 and that this included consideration of consultation responses from affected staff and trade union representatives.

 

(3)          That the proposed final business case to share a joint Revenues and Benefits Service between CDC and SNC, subject to similar consideration and approval by SNC Cabinet on 13 June 2016, be approved and implemented.

 

(4)          That authority be delegated to the Chief Finance Officer, in consultation with the Leader of the Council, to make any non-significant amendment that may be required to the business case following the decision by SNC Cabinet.

 

(5)          That the allocation of £200,000 from general fund balances to cover 50% of the implementation costs be approved.

 

Reasons

 

The proposal is to establish a Joint Revenues and Benefits service between CDC and SNC which will deliver significant financial and operational benefits.

The business case sets out the significant financial and operational benefits to establishing the proposed joint service.

 

Alternative options

 

Option1: Status Quo (No Change)

Following the decision taken by CDC Executive on 7 September 2015, retaining the status quo is no longer an option for CDC who will be insourcing the Revenues and Benefits service in 2017. While retaining the status quo is an option for SNC, it is not considered an appropriate option given the benefits and savings associated with delivering a joint service with CDC.

 

Option 2: Three-way Shared Service with Stratford-on-Avon District Council (SDC)

A three-way shared service with SDC is no longer a realistic option although serious consideration was previously given to this option.

 

Due to the different visions and strategic priorities of the three Councils regarding how to meet the financial challenges and respond to regional opportunities for devolution it has been agreed that no further three-way business cases are prepared.

 

7.30pm

13.

Proposal for a Joint Community and Leisure Service with South Northamptonshire Council pdf icon PDF 170 KB

Report of Director of Operational Delivery

 

Purpose of report

 

This report presents the final business case following consultation for a Joint Community and Leisure service across Cherwell District Council and South Northamptonshire Council (hereafter “Cherwell” or “CDC” and “South Northamptonshire” or “SNC” respectively).

 

The report recommends the arrangement of a two-way Joint Community and Leisure Service and in doing so seeks the Executive’s agreement for the non-staffing elements of the business case.

 

The proposal is part of the wider transformation programme across the two Councils.

 

Recommendations

 

The Executive is recommended to:

 

1.1       Consider the attached final business case (Appendix 1) and the consultation responses (Appendix 2) in relation to non-staffing matters.

 

1.2         To note that the business case has been considered on 26 May 2016 by the Joint Commissioning Committee (JCC) with regard to staffing matters. This included consideration of consultation responses from affected staff and trade union representatives. A verbal update on the outcome of this meeting will be given.

 

1.3         Subject to the approval of the JCC to the staffing matters, to approve and implement the proposed final business case to share a Joint Community and Leisure Service between CDC and SNC, subject to similar consideration and approval by SNC Cabinet; and

 

1.4         To delegate to the Director of Operational Delivery in consultation with the Leader of the Council any non-significant amendment that may be required to the business case following the decision by SNC Cabinet.

 

Additional documents:

Decision:

Resolved

                                                                                             

(1)          That the final business case for a Joint Community and Leisure Service with South Northamptonshire Council and the consultation responses in relation to non-staffing matters.be considered.

 

(2)          That it be noted that the business case was approved on 26 May 2016 by the Joint Commissioning Committee (JCC) with regard to staffing matters and that this included consideration of consultation responses from affected staff and trade union representatives.

 

(3)          That the proposed final business case to share a Joint Community and Leisure Service between CDC and SNC, subject to similar consideration and approval by SNC Cabinet, be approved and implemented.

 

(4)          That authority be delegated to the Director of Operational Delivery in consultation with the Leader of the Council any non-significant amendment that may be required to the business case following the decision by SNC Cabinet.

 

Minutes:

The Director of Operational Delivery submitted a report which presented the final business case following consultation for a Joint Community and Leisure service across Cherwell District Council and South Northamptonshire Council and sought agreement for the non-staffing elements of the business case.

 

The proposal was part of the wider transformation programme across the two Councils.

 

Resolved

                                                                                             

(1)          That the final business case for a Joint Community and Leisure Service with South Northamptonshire Council and the consultation responses in relation to non-staffing matters.be considered.

 

(2)          That it be noted that the business case was approved on 26 May 2016 by the Joint Commissioning Committee (JCC) with regard to staffing matters and that this included consideration of consultation responses from affected staff and trade union representatives.

 

(3)          That the proposed final business case to share a Joint Community and Leisure Service between CDC and SNC, subject to similar consideration and approval by SNC Cabinet, be approved and implemented.

 

(4)          That authority be delegated to the Director of Operational Delivery in consultation with the Leader of the Council any non-significant amendment that may be required to the business case following the decision by SNC Cabinet.

 

Reasons

 

The business case represents a significant step in the revised transformation programme across CDC and SNC. The proposed joint service would provide realigned delivery teams designed to meet the agendas for each district.

 

Alternative options

 

Not to approve the recommendations. This is not recommended as the business case remodels the existing services at both councils into a new joint service and as a result delivers savings in excess of the guidance targets set out in the February 2015 business case.

14.

Exclusion of the Press and Public

The following items contain exempt information as defined in the following paragraphs of Part 1, Schedule 12A of Local Government Act 1972.

 

1 – Information relating to any individual

 

2 – Information which is likely to reveal the identity of an individual

 

3 – Information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information).

 

4 – Information relating to any consultations or negotiations, or contemplated consultations or negotiations, in connection with any labour relations matter arising between the authority or a Minister of the Crown and employees of, or office holders under, the authority.

 

Members are reminded that whilst the following item has been marked as exempt, it is for the meeting to decide whether or not to consider it in private or in public. In making the decision, members should balance the interests of individuals or the Council itself in having access to the information. In considering their discretion members should also be mindful of the advice of Council Officers.

 

No representations have been received from the public requesting that these items be considered in public.

 

Should Members decide not to make a decision in public, they are recommended to pass the following recommendation:

 

“That under Section 100A of the Local Government Act 1972, the public and press be excluded from the meeting for the following items of business on the ground that, if the public and press were present, it would be likely that exempt information falling under the provisions of Schedule 12A, Part 1, Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 would be disclosed to them, and that in all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information.”

 

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

There being no questions on the exempt appendices to the Proposals for a Joint Revenues and Benefits Service with South Northamptonshire Council and a Joint Community and Leisure Service with South Northamptonshire Council, it was not necessary to exclude the press and public.  

7.45pm

15.

Proposal for a Joint Revenues and Benefits Service with South Northamptonshire Council - Exempt Appendix

Minutes:

Resolved

 

(1)          That the exempt appendix be noted.

7.35pm

16.

Proposal for a Joint Community and Leisure Service with South Northamptonshire Council - Exempt Appendices

Minutes:

Resolved

 

(1)          That the exempt appendices be noted.