Issue - meetings

Please note the appeals pack will be provided to members and parties to the appeal under separate cover.

The appellant, post holder ESR217, presented their case, supported by the appellant’s representative and questions were invited.

The Head of Environmental Services, submitted the case on behalf of Cherwell District Council, supported by the Head of Transformation and questions were invited.

The Head of Environmental Services made his concluding remarks and the appellant made their concluding remarks.

The Committee retired to consider the evidence. The appellant, the appellant’s representative, the Head of Environmental Services and the Head of Transformation and Improvement left the meeting.

Resolved

(1)               That the appeals of post holder ESR217 be dismissed, as in the view of the Panel there was insufficient evidence to support the grounds of the appeal.  

(Unanimous decision)

Please note the appeals pack will be provided to members and parties to the appeal under separate cover.

The appellant, post holder CX0102, presented their case, supported by the appellant’s representative and questions were invited.

Three witnesses were called by the appellant and questions were asked of each of the witnesses by the appellant’s representative and the Investigating Office and the Panel.

The Investigating Officer, who had conducted the two grievance investigations, submitted the case on behalf of Cherwell District Council, supported by the Project and Policy Manager – People and Improvement and questions were invited.

Two witnesses were called by the Investigating Officer and questions were asked of each of the witnesses by the Investigating Officer, the appellant’s representative and the Panel.

The Investigating Officer made his concluding remarks and the appellant made their concluding remarks.

The Committee retired to consider the evidence. The appellant, the appellant’s representative, the Investigating Officer and the Project and Policy Manager – People and Improvement left the meeting.

Resolved

(1)               That the appeals of post holder CX0102 be dismissed, as in the view of the Panel there was insufficient evidence to support each of the grounds of the appeal.  

(Unanimous decision)